On Sunday 07 November 2010 13:21:06 Camaleón wrote: > On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 20:40:09 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > On Vi, 05 nov 10, 19:47:58, Rob Owens wrote: > >> What I would like (and think they should have done in the case of > >> Iceweasel) is issue a security update that is simply a message to the > >> admin that stable's version of Iceweasel is now unsupported. The > >> security update should not automatically upgrade Iceweasel to the > >> backports version, but it should suggest this to the admin as a wise > >> course of action. > > > > And this has happened in the past (for Etch as far as I recall, but you > > can search the archives). AFAICT iceweasel in lenny is still supported. > > I would like to know at what level. At the same level as other package for which Debian is the de facto upstream. Any variance in that would mean a DSA would be issued. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. bss@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.