Re: Re (2): Linux hub
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 19:18:49 -0500
John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org> wrote:
> Celejar writes:
> > I suppose, but since the vast majority of applications of cheap
> > switches don't require this capability, wouldn't it be cheaper to
> > leave it out, and only include it as an extra feature for those who
> > need it?
>
> They have to have a MAC table and with current technology it costs no
> more to store 8K MAC addresses then 8.
I suspected that that might be the case.
Celejar
--
foffl.sourceforge.net - Feeds OFFLine, an offline RSS/Atom aggregator
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator
Reply to: