On Tuesday, September 07, 2010 10:13:51 you wrote: >>---- Original Message ---- >>From: bss@iguanasuicide.net >>>In <[🔎] 380-2201091623840406@netptc.net>, owens@netptc.net wrote: >>>>I'm not disagreeing with you in practice but many years ago these >>>>WERE the definitions the ITU and ISO dealt with. >>> >>>I love to see an actual ISO or ITU document that provides a >>>normative >>>definition of the any of those terms. Since you are claiming such a >>>document >>>exists, perhaps you could provide a URL, ISBN, or other reference? > >I'll see if I can dig up a reference. Remember this was in the 80s. ISO tends to keep documents around. For example, the drafts for the C89 standard, written during the 80s are still available from the C language working group's web site. (Of course, drafts aren't generally considered normative.) The standard itself may even still be available from the web store, even though it has been supplanted by the C99 standard. For less volatile areas under the auspices of ISO, much older standards are still available from the web store. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. bss@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.