Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:18:58AM +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote: > >> Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:58:58PM +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote: >>> >>> >>> Others already mentioned location. I'll just note that 'find' and 'ls >>> -lR' should have comparable speeds. find's output should be nicer to >>> parse. >>> >>> A single 'find' is normally enough to cache the relevant directories. >>> >>> >> Well, you first need to do _one_ find before for both to have the same >> speed. That's the problem. Locate seems to do what I want. >> > > That is, unless you're not really sure the relevant sub-tree is > up-to-date and run updatedb, which is equivalent to 'find /' (with > proper excludes). > > Ok. Thanks for this confirmation. -- Merciadri Luca See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/ I use PGP. If there is an incompatibility problem with your mail client, please contact me. It pays to pay attention.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature