Re: Should squid RAM management be left to the kernel or configured explicitly?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Should squid RAM management be left to the kernel or configured explicitly?
From: Klistvud <quotations@aliceadsl.fr>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 23:16:31 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1276031791.2610.0@compax>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 201006081049.56613.bss@iguanasuicide.net> (from bss@iguanasuicide.net on Tue Jun 8 17:49:56 2010)
References: <[🔎] 1275831527.32062.4@compax> <[🔎] 201006081049.56613.bss@iguanasuicide.net>

Dne, 08. 06. 2010 17:49:56 je Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. napisal(a):

However, squid is capable of caching much more data than fits intoRAM.


Thanx. Must definitely read up on that (when I find the time).

--
Regards,

Klistvud
Certifiable Loonix User #481801
http://bufferoverflow.tiddlyspot.com

Reply to:

References:
- Should squid RAM management be left to the kernel or configured explicitly?
  - From: Klistvud <quotations@aliceadsl.fr>
- Re: Should squid RAM management be left to the kernel or configured explicitly?
  - From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss@iguanasuicide.net>

Prev by Date: Re: GRUB2 - automatically generating extra entries
Next by Date: Re: Acer Aspire One wireless issue
Previous by thread: Re: Should squid RAM management be left to the kernel or configured explicitly?
Next by thread: RE - E-Quote No. 242897
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread