I'm sorry, maybe I'm to new to all this stuff and to old fashioned but isn't the point in new version make her free of bugs, faster, lighter etc.? Whats happened to KISS?Please do not judge KDE4 by not being a copy of KDE 3.5. If that was the case, there would be no point in making a new version anyway. The important question is whether KDE lacks functionality that should be there (this includes, but is not limited to, functionality present in KDE <4) and if that's the case, file a bug report. But of course, don't be bothered if the functionality *looks* different. Again, if all the functionality would look the same, there would be no point creating a new version. Sjoerd
When I was on Windows I hate so much when in every new version everything was different and I was losing days to find old options.
There are to much things that are useful in KDE 3 and now are gone.What was wrong with system:// in Konqueror, different background for different desktop, Quanta, less usage of ram, look and feel. All that stuff people love and use in everyday life. Is it cubic desktop switching useful? No it's just eye candy.
I really can't see why is KDE 4 better. If anybody can please explain me because I really don't see even one reason.
One more thing, I don't wont offend anybody. That vas just my thought and thought of ather people that I see on the net since the KDE 4 came out. I know that this mail will not change the thought of developers and this is not reason why I was writhing it.
-- Bye, Goran Dobosevic Hrvatski: www.dobosevic.com English: www.dobosevic.com/en/ Registered Linux User #503414