On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 19:37:39 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > I know that lpr is BSD and lp is SYSV, so lpr is needed for > compatibility, but when comparing the man pages, lpr seems to only be a > "half-the-features" lp. It seems to have less options, yes. But both ("lp" and "lpr") are included in CUPS so I see no problem here, we can use whichever best suits our needs. Greetings, -- Camaleón