[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: problem with ooffice from backports



On 2010-04-01, Marcelo Chiapparini <marcelo.chiappa@gmail.com> wrote:
> --000e0cd378dc79327b04833417a2
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hi!
>
> I am running Lenny in a i386 machine. I have the following line in the
> sources.list file:
>
>   deb http://www.backports.org/debian lenny-backports main contrib non-free
>
> After updating the package information, the openoffice.org-style-galaxy
> package appears in the following way in synaptic:
>
> openoffice.org-style-galaxy 1:3.2.0-4~bpo50+1
>
> But the openoffice.org and  openoffice.org-style-galaxy packages at
> backports are in version 1:3.1.1-15+squeeze1~bpo50+1, the same version is
> for the openoffice.org package in synaptic. This mismatch between the
> version of openoffice.org-style-galaxy in synaptic and in the backports site
> precludes me to install openoffice.org from backports. I commented the
> backports line in sources.list, updated the package information, uncommented
> again the line and updating the package information again, but the version
> of openoffice.org-style-galaxy package in synaptic remains the same wrong
> 1:3.2.0-4~bpo50+1. The situation is the following:
>
> package
>                version
>                                                     synaptic
>                                          backports.org
>
> openoffice.org                                1:3.1.1-15+squeeze1~bpo50+1
>                       1:3.1.1-15+squeeze1~bpo50+1
> openoffice.org-style-galaxy              1:3.2.0-4~bpo50+1
>                        1:3.1.1-15+squeeze1~bpo50+1
>
>
>
> How can I tell synaptic to updated the correct information
> regarding openoffice.org-style-galaxy version in order to match the one in
> the openoffice.org package? (the same problem with the style-oxygen package)
>

Is your architecture i386? Not all of the OOo 3.2 packages have been
built for that architecture yet. The issue was discussed recently on the
linux.debian.backports.general list.

-- 
Liam O'Toole
Birmingham, United Kingdom



Reply to: