On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 04:23:22PM -0500, John A. Sullivan III wrote: > On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 07:50 +1100, Alex Samad wrote: > > <snip> > [snip] > > > > no nslcd is not a typo, like I said there are 2 streams/groups of > > packages for pam integration you have the !older! ones. have a look at > > nslcd and its partner packages I have found them to more stable. > > [snip] > > nope this file /etc/nss-ldapd.conf used for the nss side of things which > > is what getent uses and tools like nsswitch, glibc & whoami > <snip> > Ah! That was it and that's what's different. CentOS and Ubuntu do not > separate them. I was wondering why there was a pam_ldap.conf instead of > an ldap.conf. I assumed it was to eliminate conflict with openldap's > ldap.conf. I didn't realize it was to distinguish it from > nss-ldap.conf. > > Regarding nslcd, in which repository is it? I did an apt-cache search > nslcd and it returned nothing. I track testing unstable > > Thanks very, very much - John > > -- "I also understand how tender the free enterprise system can be." - George W. Bush 07/08/2002 White House press conference, Washington, D.C.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature