Re: e2defrag
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. put forth on 2/3/2010 9:29 AM:
> No such file in stable, backports, testing, unstable, or experimental.
>
> I've never heard of such a utility, either.
I think I found what happened to it:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2006-December/030918.html
> It should be noted that fragmentation is less of an issue on ext2/3/4 file
> systems than on vfat file systems.
Its fragmentation performance in relation to vfat is irrelevant. Read the works
of the folks at MIT who wrote EXT2. It *will* fragment over time, just not
quite as bad as some other "modern" filesystems. The worst fragmentation
scenario is appending large files over time. And guess what I have stored on
one of my EXT2 filesystems? Yes, you guessed it, mbox files. I keep all my
mail, all list mail, including debian-user, in mbox files (dovecot). They're
only a combined 200MB at this point, but they will only continue to grow, and
continue to become more fragmented. Thus, I started looking for a defrag tool
for EXT2. It appears that Debian removed it from the distro for fear that ppl
would use it on EXT3/4 filesystems and corrupt them as e2defrag only works on
EXT2. It's apparently not been updated to work with the journals and other data
structures of EXT3/4.
Luckily I've got a dedicated /home partition where these mbox files are stored.
So worst case scenario I can just create a new XFS partition in my unallocated
space and move everything over. XFS has a non-destructive online defragger, and
it's a superior filesystem to EXT2/3/4, Resiser, and JFS anyway. ;) Matter of
fact XFS has some really nice management tools, light years ahead of EXT2/3/4
and Reiser.
I love having so many good choices available to solve a (potential) problem.
--
Stan
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: e2defrag
- From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss@iguanasuicide.net>
- References:
- e2defrag
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
- Re: e2defrag
- From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss@iguanasuicide.net>