Brad Alexander writes: > Not to end 2010 with a flame war, but this is the one thing that > irritates me most about the FSF. They advocate free software, which is > a laudable goal, but they seem to only acknowledge it *if* you conform > to their definition of free. The FSF explicitly acknowledges the BSD as a Free license. > By definition, if a user chooses to, they should be *free* to use > commercial software... They are. -- John Hasler