Re: kernel option for scsi emulation
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:10:48 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> On 11/12/2010 01:49 PM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> Compare both "lsmod | grep ata" outputs.
>>
>>
> Good suggestion:
>
> hugo@Debian:/$ grep ata 11.2.6.32-5-686.lsmod
> ata_generic 2047 0
> libata 115745 3 ata_generic,sata_via,pata_via
> pata_via 5701 4
> sata_via 5608 0
> scsi_mod 101401 6 ums_cypress,usb_storage,sg,sr_mod,sd_mod,libata
If that's correct, then I'm missing :-)
kernel 2.6.32 was not the one using legacy driver _but_ it is
loading it (pata_via).
hugo@Debian:/$ grep ata 11.2.6.36-hvw.lsmod
> ata_generic 2075 0
> libata 116648 2 ata_generic,sata_via
> sata_via 5380 0
> scsi_mod 100151 5 sg,sd_mod,ums_cypress,usb_storage,libata
>
>
> So both kernels have libata, but only 2.6.32-5-686 has pata_via and
> sr_mod.
Yep, but 2.6.32 was using "/dev/sd*" nomenaclature for Maxtor disk >:-?
2.6.32-5-686
/dev/sda1: LABEL="6Y080P0.01" UUID="1205def1-2141-4b3a-97d0-0b94ca1c4ff2" TYPE="ext2"
/dev/sda5: LABEL="6Y080P0.05" UUID="dc767bc6-ebe4-4dfb-a8f1-739709598dc7" TYPE="ext2"
/dev/sda6: LABEL="6Y080P0.06" UUID="a7cfe5f2-b136-4a73-ac8a-f3e2121102c8" TYPE="ext2"
/dev/sda7: LABEL="6Y080P0.07" UUID="45ee8af8-c443-42d4-ae59-6f68e33932e8" TYPE="ext2"
/dev/sda8: LABEL="win_D" UUID="4131-BA32" TYPE="vfat"
/dev/sda9: LABEL="6Y080P0.09" UUID="5a09faf0-6f8e-4c72-a23b-46fe963754ef" TYPE="swap"
/dev/sda10: LABEL="6Y080P0.10" UUID="66c1d026-1e4c-4392-8aa0-e0d9f2cb4277" TYPE="ext2"
2.6.36-hvw
/dev/hda1: LABEL="6Y080P0.01" UUID="1205def1-2141-4b3a-97d0-0b94ca1c4ff2" TYPE="ext2"
/dev/hda5: LABEL="6Y080P0.05" UUID="dc767bc6-ebe4-4dfb-a8f1-739709598dc7" TYPE="ext2"
/dev/hda6: LABEL="6Y080P0.06" UUID="a7cfe5f2-b136-4a73-ac8a-f3e2121102c8" TYPE="ext2"
/dev/hda7: LABEL="6Y080P0.07" UUID="45ee8af8-c443-42d4-ae59-6f68e33932e8" TYPE="ext2"
/dev/hda8: LABEL="win_D" UUID="4131-BA32" TYPE="vfat"
/dev/hda9: LABEL="6Y080P0.09" UUID="5a09faf0-6f8e-4c72-a23b-46fe963754ef" TYPE="swap"
/dev/hda10: LABEL="6Y080P0.10" UUID="66c1d026-1e4c-4392-8aa0-e0d9f2cb4277" TYPE="ext2"
Is that right?
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
Reply to: