Re: Re (4): routing
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:39:02PM -0700, peasthope@shaw.ca wrote:
> From: lee <lee@yun.yagibdah.d.>
> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:09:36 +0200
>
> /etc/shorewall/masq, "eth0 172.24.0.0/16" means that subnets
> 172.24.0.0/16 are hidden behind eth0; not that eth0 is behind 172.24.0.0.
Sorry, you´re right, it´s the outgoing interface(s) that need to be
put there, not the interface(s) to which the local zones are
connected.
> > Keep things simple.
>
> Absolutely. Preceeding paragraph is an example. I'll tackle
> remaining errors as time is available.
Well, does it work now? Looks like it should ...
Reply to: