[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re (4): routing

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:39:02PM -0700, peasthope@shaw.ca wrote:
> From:	lee <lee@yun.yagibdah.d.>
> Date:	Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:09:36 +0200
> /etc/shorewall/masq, "eth0" means that subnets 
> are hidden behind eth0; not that eth0 is behind

Sorry, you´re right, it´s the outgoing interface(s) that need to be
put there, not the interface(s) to which the local zones are

> > Keep things simple.
> Absolutely.  Preceeding paragraph is an example.  I'll tackle 
> remaining errors as time is available.

Well, does it work now? Looks like it should ...

Reply to: