Re: UVC cameras

[Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com>]

On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:57:40 -0300, Eike Lantzsch wrote:

> On Tuesday 12 October 2010 05:00:36 PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
>> Somewhere I've read that a camera must be UVC conformant to qualify to
>> use the Vista label on the package.  It wasn't an authoritative source.
>> 
>> Recently I put an inexpensive camera on Squeeze and got a local image
>> in Skype.  Oddly the remote image was OK without the camera but garbled
>> with the camera connected.
>> 
>> Can anyone explain this observation or cite pertinent documentation?
>> 
>> Thanks,          ... Peter E.
> 
> Not enough info to help, really, but what about your bandwidth?

Yep, it's a bit vague description. I would also test the webcam with 
another program like Kopete or Ekiga, to discard any issue with Skype.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón