Re: UVC cameras
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:57:40 -0300, Eike Lantzsch wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 October 2010 05:00:36 PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
>> Somewhere I've read that a camera must be UVC conformant to qualify to
>> use the Vista label on the package. It wasn't an authoritative source.
>> Recently I put an inexpensive camera on Squeeze and got a local image
>> in Skype. Oddly the remote image was OK without the camera but garbled
>> with the camera connected.
>> Can anyone explain this observation or cite pertinent documentation?
>> Thanks, ... Peter E.
> Not enough info to help, really, but what about your bandwidth?
Yep, it's a bit vague description. I would also test the webcam with
another program like Kopete or Ekiga, to discard any issue with Skype.