[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Status of RAID (md)



also sprach Daniel Bareiro <daniel-listas@gmx.net> [2010.08.02.0420 +0200]:
> md2 : active raid5 sda3[0] sdd3[4](F) sdc3[2]
>       2136170880 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/2] [U_U_]
[…]
> That is to say, the RAID has four disks and failed both the spare
> disk and other disk from array. What is unclear to me is why if
> there are two active disks,

There is no spare disk. The reason why sdd is listed as "faulty
spare" is because it's out of sync. Remove and re-add it:

  mdadm --remove /dev/md2 /dev/sdd3
  mdadm --add    /dev/md2 /dev/sdd3

> md2 : active raid5 sdb3[4](S) sda3[0] sdd3[5](F) sdc3[2]
>       2136170880 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/2] [U_U_]

This is indeed a bit strange, but the array might start syncing in
the new disk (called a spare) as soon as you remove sdd3 (see
above).

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
"if there's anything more important than my ego,
 i want it caught and shot now."
                                                -- zaphod beeblebrox

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Reply to: