Re: suspend to disk unreliable?
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: suspend to disk unreliable?
- From: Chris Bannister <mockingbird@earthlight.co.nz>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 01:40:57 +1200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20100710134057.GL24436@fischer>
- In-reply-to: <20100628193736.GG4996@yun.yagibdah.de>
- References: <pan.2010.06.27.11.21.05@gmail.com> <20100627113730.GE3979@yun.yagibdah.de> <pan.2010.06.27.12.00.51@gmail.com> <20100627132806.GH3979@yun.yagibdah.de> <pan.2010.06.27.13.43.49@gmail.com> <20100627152845.GK3979@yun.yagibdah.de> <20100628151606.GA30364@debian.org> <20100628163042.GE4996@yun.yagibdah.de> <1277746311.15039.0@compax> <20100628193736.GG4996@yun.yagibdah.de>
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 09:37:36PM +0200, lee wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 07:31:51PM +0200, Klistvud wrote:
> > Dne, 28. 06. 2010 18:30:42 je lee napisal(a):
> > >
> > >Yes, but I don't want to suspend to RAM because the point is to save
> > >power, and suspend to RAM will fail when the power fails.
> >
> > In that case, pm-suspend-hybrid should give you the best of both
> > worlds. Anyway, suspend to RAM *does* save some power (and quite
> > some heat) even on a desktop.
>
> Why would I suspend to RAM and keep the system powered? That doesn't
> make any sense to me.
If that's not a typo there's your problem. RAM **needs** power.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volatile_memory
--
Chris.
Reply to: