Re: lenny iso signed with key 64E6EA7D
Rob Owens wrote:
>I downloaded the latest Lenny netinst for i386. The SHA512SUMS file is
>signed with a key id of 64E6EA7D. However, I can't find any info on
>that key anywhere. I tried searching public keyservers and googling for
>it, but nothing has turned up.
>
>Call me paranoid, but I never install a system unless I can verify the
>signature...
>
>Can anybody shed some light on this?
Hi Rob,
Which keyservers did you use?
$ gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-keys 64E6EA7D
gpg: requesting key 64E6EA7D from hkp server keys.gnupg.net
gpg: key 64E6EA7D: public key "Debian CD signing key <debian-cd@lists.debian.org>" imported
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1 (RSA: 1)
It's also on keyring.debian.org. I created the key for signing Debian
CD releases, and it's signed by a number of people including two
previous DPLs and members of the release team:
$ gpg --list-sigs 64E6EA7D
pub 4096R/64E6EA7D 2009-10-03
uid Debian CD signing key <debian-cd@lists.debian.org>
sig 3 64E6EA7D 2009-10-03 Debian CD signing key <debian-cd@lists.debian.org>
sig 88C7C1F7 2009-10-03 Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
sig 3442684E 2009-10-03 Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
sig AFF122B0 2009-10-03 Christopher J. Walker <C.J.Walker@physics.org>
sig 29982E5A 2009-10-03 Steve Langasek <vorlon@dodds.net>
sig 68FD549F 2009-10-05 Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
sig 01AA4A64 2009-10-03 Steve Langasek <steve.langasek@canonical.com>
sig AF6C61DD 2009-10-05 Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
sig 95861109 2009-10-06 Ben Hutchings (DOB: 1977-01-11)
sig A40F862E 2009-10-09 Neil McGovern <maulkin@halon.org.uk>
sig 0125D5C0 2009-10-14 Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
"The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that
English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words; on
occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them
unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary." -- James D. Nicoll
Reply to: