On Lu, 05 iul 10, 22:43:44, Urs Thuermann wrote: > Now my question is where these differences come from and which results > are the correct (better) ones. From the output to stdout I see that > cdrdao uses the Paranoia DAE library and Joerg Schilling's SCSI > library to actually read the audio CDs. With ldd I see it is not > linked dynamically to these libraries. So one question is, do cdrdao > and cdparanoia use different library versions? Maybe it's just me, but after reading the cdparanoia FAQ[1] I wouldn't use anything else for CD ripping ;) [1] http://xiph.org/paranoia/faq.html I doubt (but have no proof) cdrdao can handle all errors that cdparanoia can handle. Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature