On Ma, 01 iun 10, 15:44:49, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > > Of course, SUS basically ignores any locale other than "POSIX" or "C", > > > but there is rarely a good reason to be different in other locales. > > > > One reason would be that '%b %e %Y' makes sense only to Americans >:-) > > In this specific case, I'd say that is a good reason to be different. I > wouldn't say ISO format is the correct way to be different -- probably > something that uses '%b', '%e', and '%Y' and has 3 spaces, but not is the same > order is appropriate. > > That's just my gut feeling though. It's a local(e) thing, so I can only > really speak for en_US@Arkansas. Unfortunately ls is going against the locale here: ,----[ /usr/share/i18n/ro_RO ] | LC_TIME ... | % Appropriate date and time representation (%c) ... | % "%a %d %b %Y %T %z" | d_t_fmt "<U0025><U0061><U0020><U0025><U0064><U0020><U0025><U0062><U0020>/ | <U0025><U0059><U0020><U0025><U0054><U0020><U0025><U007A>" | % | % Appropriate date representation (%x) | % "%d.%m.%Y" | d_fmt "<U0025><U0064><U002E><U0025><U006D><U002E><U0025><U0059>" ... | END LC_TIME `---- Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature