Re: Nepomuk wants virtuoso soprano

[AG <computing.account@googlemail.com>]

On 20/05/10 12:19, tv.debian@googlemail.com wrote:
> Le 20/05/2010 10:12, AG wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > Although I am logging into Gnome DE on an up-to-date Squeeze system, I
> > receive a message at login that declares Nepomuk requires virtuoso
> > soprano to work. Having looked nepomuk up via Google, it seems like it
> > is something from our KDE friends, but using apt-cache search I don't
> > see anything called virtuoso soprano to draw down to satisfy nepomuk.
> >
> > My question is: how does one satisfy nepomuk and/ or is nepomuk even
> > necessary?
> >
> > Also, is it just me or do other folk here also find that KDE seems to be
> > pulling in loads of dependencies ... databases, nepomuk (which wants
> > virtuoso soprano), etc. just to operate? Seems like a lot of overhead is
> > required to prop up KDE4.* these days.
> >
> > Anyway, any suggestions re: the nepomuk issue?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > AG
>
> Hi,
>
> virtuoso-minimal is on the recommend list for soprano-daemon, which is 
> brought in by libsoprano4 (a depend of many kde4 apps).
>
> Here I have:
>
> aptitude search ~S~i~nnepomuk
> i   libnepomuk4
> i   libnepomukquery4a
>
> aptitude search ~S~i~nvirtuoso
>
> aptitude search ~S~i~nsoprano
> i   libsoprano4
> i   soprano-daemon
>
> aptitude why soprano-daemon
> i   libsoprano4 Dépend soprano-daemon (= 2.4.3+dfsg.1-1)
>
> Hope it helps.

It does/ did help, thank you.  I just pulled down virtuoso-minimal, and 
that dragged in a few more libraries, so hopefully that will shut 
nepomuk from complaining at me each time I logon.

Thanks mate - appreciate your help.

AG