Re: Re(2): Postscript: Grub2 in current Squeeze
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 10:29 -0800, email@example.com wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 17:03 -0800, PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
> > Sorry for the absence of thread connection. This mailer doesn't
> > provide In-reply-to.
> Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:10:16 +0000, Tixy <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote,
> > I think it does, check the headers :-)
> The login for the Web based mailer is here.
> The header is minimal. I couldn't find any
> way to specify an In-reply-to parameter.
> If you can tell me where it is, I'll happily
> use it in the future.
Err, both the message I just quoted and the one I originally replied to
have an "In-reply-to" header when I look at the message source, and they
are correctly threaded by my email program (Evolution). I don't know how
the headers got there, but if your mailer didn't do it, then there must
be some magic going on somewhere.
Or where you referring to a different message not having a thread