[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Transparent reply-to-mailing-list for broken mailers



On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 16:53 -0600, ghe wrote:
> >> If this is official Debian policy, then why don't they set the  
> >> Reply-To
> >> header to be the list?
> 
> Hey, Man. It's Policy. Put something like this in /etc/procmailrc on  
> your mail server:
> 
> FORMAIL=/usr/bin/formail
> 
> :0Hfhw
> * ^Return-Path: <bounce-debian-user=ghe=slsware.com@lists.debian.org>
> | $FORMAIL -i "Reply-To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>"
> 
> (Note that my name is in the Return-Path.)
> 
> No addy editing, no buttons that don't exist on all my broken email  
> clients, and no surprises for others on the debian-user list...

Wow, transparent reply-to-list for broken mailers:  Very nice!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: