Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?

[Paul Scott <waterhorse@ultrasw.com>]

On May 2, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Harry Rickards wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> John Hasler wrote:
> > Harry Rickards writes:
> > > Plus, even though emacs does other stuff apart from editing, what  
> > > can
> > > emacs do that a separate tool can't do? Surely if emacs is more  
> > > than an
> > > editor, it doesn't follow Doug McIlroy's UNIX philosophy
> >
> > GNU's Not Unix.
>
> Linux != GNU


Meaning??

GNU is an OS,  Linux is a kernel.

Unfortunately popular usage has led to Linux incorrectly meaning GNU/ 
Linux and even more.

Paul Scott