[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: digital camera recomendations



On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 08:18:32PM -0500, H.S. wrote:
> Allan Wind wrote:
> 
> > Most cameras support mass storage device class these days.
> > 
> >> AA batteries
> 
> How about Canon Powershot A620 or a more recent model in these series?

we just bought a power shot g10 love it and it works well with debian -
mass storage  and its recognised as a digital camera

the only issue i have is the flash takes a bit to get ready when turning
on
> 
> 
> > That is probably what limits your choices the most.
> > 
> >> and that uses a generic
> >> mem card.
> > 
> > You may want to make that one of the SD (or Compact Flash).  Sony, I 
> > think, are the only company that pushes memory sticks.  MMC was iffy on 
> > Linux although I think things improved and the world is moving on.
> 
> 
> I have experience with DSC S40 digital camera by Sony. It uses memory
> stick. But it plays really nice with Linux (Ubuntu 8.04 in this case).
> IIRC, it plays nicer than some Canon cameras .... I was able to change
> the label of the memory stick while the camera was connected to the USB
> port, something I haven't been able to do with a Canon camera. Other
> than this little quirk though, I have never had a problem with any Canon
> camera either (have Powershot A520 and G5, both work quite nicely with
> Debian Testing, Unstable and Ubuntu).
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Please reply to this list only. I read this list on its corresponding
> newsgroup on gmane.org. Replies sent to my email address are just
> filtered to a folder in my mailbox and get periodically deleted without
> ever having been read.
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 

-- 
NEVER RESPOND TO CRITICAL PRESS.  IT IS A GAME YOU CAN ONLY LOSE, AND IT
MAKES US LOOK BAD.
		-- Bruce Perens

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: