On Friday 18 December 2009 12:12:52 Rick Thomas wrote: > I understand "normal churn" in testing and unstable, but these > problems have persisted for over a week. > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > epiphany-extensions-more: Depends: epiphany-extensions (< 2.27) > > but 2.28.1-2 is to be installed. > > epiphany-browser: Conflicts: epiphany-gecko but 2.29.3-1 is to be > > installed. > > grdc: Depends: remmina which is a virtual package. > > gnome: Depends: tomboy (>= 1.0) but it is not installable > If I should file a bug > report, Based on the replies I've seen to your other thread, the release team is aware of the issue, but I really don't think a bug report would hurt. You might want to let Steve Langasek, Frans Pop, Philipp Kern, and Luk Claes know the bug number, they seem to be working the issue -- or at least they have provided some analysis that has been cross posted to a number of lists. Besides those 3 individuals, you may also want to notify the Gnome, PowerPC, and release teams; they should have at least one member on the respective public discussion lists. > which package should I file it against -- there are so many > that seem to be involved? gnome or meta-gnome2 -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. firstname.lastname@example.org ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.