Re: What is consensus for meaning of stable/unstable? (Re: Does everything depend on everything?)
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: What is consensus for meaning of stable/unstable? (Re: Does everything depend on everything?)
- From: Raquel <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:01:19 -0800
- Message-id: <email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <20091105001037.GB5184@fischer>
- References: <20091030122826.GO25557@niof.net> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20091031095739.GY26672@sherohman.org> <4AEC1942.email@example.com> <4AEC446C.firstname.lastname@example.org> <4AEC544F.email@example.com> <4AEC7A18.firstname.lastname@example.org> <4AEC940C.email@example.com> <20091105001037.GB5184@fischer>
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 13:10:37 +1300
Chris Bannister <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> AIUI, that _is_ the meaning. Think, stable - unchanging. esp in
> resp to API's etc.
> unstable - changing frequently at random.
> Not to be confused with "buggy ness" or "more likely to crash" etc.
The best place to get an answer to that question is from Debian
Family values are a little like family vacations-subject to
changeable weather and remembered more fondly with the passage of
time. Though it rained all week at the beach, it's often the
momentary rainbows that we remember.