Re: Why no Skype packages?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why no Skype packages?
From: Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 10:09:45 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] pjnba6x8sp.ln2@news.roaima.co.uk>
Reply-to: chris@roaima.co.uk
References: <clUtq-eR-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <clUtq-eR-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <clUtq-eR-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <clUtq-eR-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <clUtq-eR-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <clUDg-rV-9@gated-at.bofh.it>

Alex Samad <alex@samad.com.au> wrote:
> I have heard just to many bad things about skype, eves dropping etc,
> sorry why use skype instead of voip.

Skype /is/ VoIP. It's just not an open standards-based protocol like
SIP or (I believe) IAX.

Chris

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why no Skype packages?
  - From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir@cohens.org.il>

Prev by Date: Re: Debian RAM supporting.
Next by Date: Re: Why no Skype packages?
Previous by thread: Re: Brother HL2040 printer/lpr stopped working after update
Next by thread: Re: Why no Skype packages?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread