On Monday 2009 January 05 12:03:19 Ron Johnson wrote: > On 01/05/09 11:41, Kelly Clowers wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 06:47, L. V. Gandhi <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI > >> > >> <email@example.com> wrote: > >>> Please reply to the list, not personally to me. > >> > >> Sorry. I use GMail. It doesn't use reply to it seems. I searched google > >> to use that reply-to in lists mail. But I am not successful. > > > > I know what you mean. It is one of gmail's biggest failings. > > Please suggest that they add that feature. I mention it them > > at least once a year. > > Or ditch Gmail for something sane. Whatever is the solution, it is the poster's responsibility to follow the Code of Conduct and not the list's (or project's) responsibility to make the Code of Conduct match the default behavior of all mail clients, which is impossible anyway. (I'm in favor of ditching gmail, but I understand many find it quite useful.) -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. firstname.lastname@example.org ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.