[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Which package for libawt.so



On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:11 AM, hce <webmail.hce@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:02 PM, M.Reza Qurbani
<mreza.qurbani@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:43 AM, hce <webmail.hce@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am running opera 9.52, there is an error "ERROR: ld.so: object
>> 'libawt.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored". I could not
>> find there is any libawt.so in the /lib or /usr/lib. I searched libawt
>> without any results. Please advise which Debian package includes
>> libawt.so?
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
> Which version are you using?
>
> If you are using Etch, try this:
> $ sudo apt-get install sun-java5-bin

Debian GNU/Linux 4.0

I installed sun-java5-bin:

/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun/jre/lib/i386/libawt.so
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun/jre/lib/i386/server/libjvm.so

I added /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun/jre/lib/i386 and
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun/jre/lib/i386/client to the ld config conf
and updated by ldconfig. But I still got following error:

$ opera
~$ ERROR: ld.so: object 'libawt.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be
preloaded: ignored.
dlopen(librt.so) failed (This is not fatal, but some plug-ins may fail
if they use librt without pulling it in themselves)

I can see from ldconfig that both librt.so and libawt.so are there:

libawt.so (libc6, hwcap: 0x1000000000000) =>
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.14/jre/lib/i386/libawt.so
librt.so (libc6, OS ABI: Linux 2.4.1) => /usr/lib/librt.so

What is missing here?

Thank you M.Reza Qurbani and Andrew.

Google guided me to:

"...
3)edit opera preferences:
tools, preferences, advanced tab, content section, Java Options button, add the path /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.10/jre/lib/i386/ and validate with the validate button.
..."

http://my.opera.com/SolimiaN/blog/2007/05/02/error-ld-so-object-libjvm-so-from-ld-preload-cannot-be-preloaded-ignored


M.Reza Qurbani

Reply to: