The Friday 24 October 2008 15:37:35 Thomas Preud'homme, you wrote : > The Friday 24 October 2008 04:09:07 Amit Uttamchandani, you wrote : > > > Yeah I did upgrade the xorg and mesa to be able to install radeonhd. > > > Here are the package that have been upgraded : > > > > > > [MIS A JOUR] libgl1-mesa-dri 7.0.3-6 -> 7.2-1 > > > [MIS A JOUR] libgl1-mesa-glx 7.0.3-6 -> 7.2-1 > > > [MIS A JOUR] xserver-xorg 1:7.3+18 -> 1:7.4~4 > > > [MIS A JOUR] xserver-xorg-core 2:1.4.2-7 -> 2:1.5.2-1 > > > [MIS A JOUR] xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.0.3-1 -> 1:2.0.3-2 > > > [MIS A JOUR] xserver-xorg-input-kbd 1:1.3.1-1 -> 1:1.3.1-2 > > > [MIS A JOUR] xserver-xorg-input-mouse 1:1.3.0-1 -> 1:1.3.0-2 > > > [MIS A JOUR] xserver-xorg-input-synaptics 0.14.7~git20070706-3 -> > > > 0.15.0+git20080820-1 > > > [MIS A JOUR] xserver-xorg-video-mach64 6.8.0-1 -> 6.8.0-3 > > > [MIS A JOUR] xserver-xorg-video-r128 6.8.0-1 -> 6.8.0-2 > > > [MIS A JOUR] xserver-xorg-video-radeon 1:6.9.0-1+lenny4 -> > > > 1:6.9.0+git20081012.c0e6cb6d-1 > > > > This is basically the same set of packages that got upgraded for me. > > You said you compiled 1.2.2? There is 1.2.3 out for radeonhd? Could you > > try installing that from experimental and see how that goes? > > Nop I compiled 1.2.3 sorry because it's not in experimental for amd64 yet. > I'll try to use the package from experimental as soon as he is compiled for > amd64, it shouldn't take more than a week I think. > > The strange thing is when downgrading to 1.2.1-3 (the version I can get > from experimental) I still have direct rendering ok according to glxinfo > althought the debian changelog didn't mention backporting the patch for DRI > in their 1.2.1-3 versions. Software which ask DRI accept launching indeed > but they are as slow as if it was software rendering. What could make the X > server claim there is DRI althought it is software rendering ? > > Regards, > > Thomas Preud'homme Well, I have the experimental version of xorg and radeonhd. glxinfo | grep render tells me I have direct rendering but it is far slower than with fglrx. What's wrong with my configuration ? Configuration follows : 8:07 robotux@simplet ~% dpkg -l | grep xorg ii xorg 1:7.4~4 X.Org X Window System ii xorg-docs 1:1.4-3 Miscellaneous documentation for the X.Org so ii xserver-xorg 1:7.4~4 the X.Org X server ii xserver-xorg-core 2:1.5.2-1 Xorg X server - core server ii xserver-xorg-dev 2:1.5.2-1 Xorg X server - development files ii xserver-xorg-input-all 1:7.4~4 the X.Org X server -- input driver metapacka ii xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.0.3-2 X.Org X server -- evdev input driver ii xserver-xorg-input-kbd 1:1.3.1-2 X.Org X server -- keyboard input driver ii xserver-xorg-input-mouse 1:1.3.0-2 X.Org X server -- mouse input driver ii xserver-xorg-input-synaptics 0.15.0+git20080820-1 Synaptics TouchPad driver for X.Org/XFree86 ii xserver-xorg-input-wacom 0.8.1.6-1+ X.Org X server -- Wacom input driver ii xserver-xorg-video-all 1:7.4~4 the X.Org X server -- output driver metapack ii xserver-xorg-video-apm 1:1.2.0-2 X.Org X server -- APM display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-ark 1:0.7.0-2 X.Org X server -- ark display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.9.0+git20081012.c0e6cb6d-1 X.Org X server -- ATI display driver wrapper ii xserver-xorg-video-chips 1:1.2.0-2 X.Org X server -- Chips display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-cirrus 1:1.2.1-2 X.Org X server -- Cirrus display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-fbdev 1:0.4.0-2 X.Org X server -- fbdev display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-i128 1:1.3.1-1 X.Org X server -- i128 display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.4.2-1 X.Org X server -- Intel i8xx, i9xx display d ii xserver-xorg-video-mach64 6.8.0-3 X.Org X server -- ATI Mach64 display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-mga 1:1.4.9.dfsg-2 X.Org X server -- MGA display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-neomagic 1:1.2.1-2 X.Org X server -- Neomagic display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-nv 1:2.1.12-1 X.Org X server -- NV display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-openchrome 1:0.2.903+svn599-1 X.Org X server -- VIA display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-r128 6.8.0-2 X.Org X server -- ATI r128 display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-radeon 1:6.9.0+git20081012.c0e6cb6d-1 X.Org X server -- ATI Radeon display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd 1.2.3-1 X.Org X server -- AMD/ATI r5xx, r6xx display ii xserver-xorg-video-rendition 1:4.2.0.dfsg.1-3 X.Org X server -- Rendition display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-s3 1:0.6.0-2 X.Org X server -- legacy S3 display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-s3virge 1:1.10.1-2 X.Org X server -- S3 ViRGE display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-savage 1:2.2.1-3 X.Org X server -- Savage display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion 1:1.6.0-2 X.Org X server -- SiliconMotion display driv ii xserver-xorg-video-sis 1:0.10.0-2 X.Org X server -- SiS display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-sisusb 1:0.9.0-2 X.Org X server -- SiS USB display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-tdfx 1:1.4.0-2 X.Org X server -- tdfx display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-trident 1:1.3.0-2 X.Org X server -- Trident display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-tseng 1:1.2.0-2 X.Org X server -- Tseng display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-v4l 0.2.0-2 X.Org X server -- Video 4 Linux display driv ii xserver-xorg-video-vesa 1:2.0.0-2 X.Org X server -- VESA display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-vmware 1:10.16.5-1 X.Org X server -- VMware display driver ii xserver-xorg-video-voodoo 1:1.2.0-2 X.Org X server -- Voodoo display driver 18:50 robotux@simplet ~% lspci | grep Radeon 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc M56P [Radeon Mobility X1600] radeonhd is selected in my xorg.conf Regards, Thomas Preud'homme -- Why debian : http://www.debian.org/intro/why_debian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.