On Mon,08.Sep.08, 16:27:21, Chris Burkhardt wrote: [...] > > Of course the NAT at the ISP level? > > I've never heard of NAT at the ISP level. Are there really so few unallocated > IPv4 addresses that this is necessary? This is not unusual here. Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature