[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: udev and partitioning



On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 07:16:54AM -0700, - Xian wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I just setup a machine with an ide disk for / and two sata disks I intend to mirror for storage. There were two partitions on the sata disks I wiped out to turn into one big linux raid autodetect partition. With /dev/sda, the processes worked just fine. I cfdisk'ed the drive and it's device node showed /dev/sda and /dev/sda1. The second disk I partitioned and udev never updated and continued to show /dev/sdb, /dev/sdb1, and /dev/sdb2. 
> 
> I tried echo'ing "- - -" into the proc scsci scan file to try to get the change to kick. dmesg showed that the kernel saw sdb correctly, but udev never updated. I even ran udevmonitor and did the echo rescan thing, but udev never even got the hotplug notification.
> 
> I've since rebooted the box and all was well, so I built my mirror. But I'm a bit nervous that I had to reboot. If I loose a drive, will I have to reboot to get hotplug to work then too? Should I have had to rebooted to get the partition table rescanned? Is there a way to force udev to start over and rescan everything? Is there a reason why the kernel saw /dev/sdb1, but udev did not manage the nodes properly?

I usually run udevtrigger  or /etc/init.d/udev restart if I want udev to
re look at the system (not sure if thats the right way, its just worked
for me)


> 
> Thanks,
> Christian
> 
> 
>       
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 

-- 
I sat laughing snidely into my notebook until they showed me a PC running
Linux. And oh! It was as though the heavens opened and God handed down a
client-side OS so beautiful, so graceful, and so elegant that a million
Microsoft developers couldn't have invented it even if they had a hundred
years and a thousand crates of Jolt cola.
		-- LAN Times

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: