Re: network not starting at boot
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 18:32 +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> michael:
> > On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 17:37 +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> >>
> >> Plaese post the contents of the interfaces file.
> >
> > mkb2@veri:/etc/network$ cat interfaces
> > # Used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8). See the interfaces(5) manpage or
> > # /usr/share/doc/ifupdown/examples for more information.
> >
> > # The loopback network interface
> > auto lo
> > iface lo inet loopback
> >
> > # The primary network interface
> > auto eth0
> > iface eth0 inet dhcp
> > pre-up /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/iptables-firewall.sh
>
> If eth0 is the interface you want to use and which you give as an
> argument to dhclient when manually running it, this should be fine.
yes (although I just run 'dhclient' without an argument):
mkb2@veri:~$ sudo ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:19:D1:E5:06:2F
inet addr:130.88.15.180 Bcast:130.88.255.255
Mask:255.255.0.0
inet6 addr: fe80::219:d1ff:fee5:62f/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:190862 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:5961 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:28320647 (27.0 MiB) TX bytes:470522 (459.4 KiB)
Memory:e1300000-e1320000
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
> Are you using Gnome? If yes, do you have Network Manager installed
> (package network-manager). This has messed up a lot of users' networking
> setups.
I'm trying xcfe
By comparing with another box I see that the working version has
(/var/log/messages)
Jul 17 19:49:25 amd64 kernel: NET: Registered protocol family 10
Jul 17 19:49:25 amd64 kernel: lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions
Jul 17 19:49:25 amd64 kernel: IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling driver
Jul 17 19:49:28 amd64 dhcdbd: Started up.
whereas non-working has only
Jul 17 14:49:27 (none) kernel: [ 8.120950] NET: Registered protocol
family 10
Jul 17 14:49:27 (none) kernel: [ 8.121367] lo: Disabled Privacy
Extensions
Does that mean anything?
thanks again, michael
Reply to: