On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 05:53:05PM -0500, Mumia W.. wrote: > On 06/08/2008 02:51 PM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 02:08:36PM -0500, Mumia W.. wrote: >>> I'm trying to create a Sid chroot system, and cdebootstrap downloads >>> many things, but it displays an error message at the end. >>> >>> First I see this message: >>> I: Can't find package libtasn1-2-bin for exclusion >> >> looks like libtasn1-2 went out with sarge. And does it actually say >> "exclusion"? >> >> how up to date is your install of cdebootstrap? YOu could grep through >> the cdebootstrap configs and see if you could replace the refernces to >> libtasn1-2* with libtasn1-3*. >> >> hth >> >> A > > I'm using cdebootstrap 0.3.15. My O/S is Etch. Yes it actually says > "exclusion". > > libtasn1-[23] do appear in /usr/share/cdebootstrap/sid/packages: > > -------------------------------------- > Comment: $LastChangedBy: bastian $ > Comment: $LastChangedDate: 2006-08-24 19:03:46 +0000 (Do, 24 Aug 2006) $ > Comment: $LastChangedRevision: 1236 $ > > Section: base > Arch: any > Packages: apt, apt-utils > > Section: build > Packages: > build-essential > fakeroot > > Section: standard > Arch: any > Packages: > priority-required > priority-important > -libtasn1-2-bin > -libtasn1-3-bin > ---------------------end------------------- > > I don't know how to interpret that however. since that file hasn't been updated since 2006, I'd say a bug report is in order. As I read it, it wants all priority-required and priority-important packages except libtasn1-2-bin and libtasn1-3-bin. *I* would just remove the libtasn1-2-bin line and see what happens. I would also file a bug report as cdebootstrap shouldn't fail when you exclude a package that doesn't exist, IMO. A
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature