Re: [Totally OT] Re: Hmmm. A question. Was [Re: Debian is losing its users]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> On Friday 11 April 2008 10:10:22 pm Mark Allums wrote:
> > The problems with waste are slowly being solved, even without breeders.
> > But you make a good point. However, I would prefer it if the
> > breeders were in the arid Southwest deserts, and not at Hanford.*
One of the "waste" problems is also caused by a lack of "recycling". American
reactors are forced to store their spent fuel, rather than have it
reprocessed into 95% new fuel and 5% waste.
The highly radioactive wastes decay quickly, so nuclear waste is turning out
not to be such a large problem as, well, "as we were told".
The really nasty sites, like Hanford, are government sites. Removing limited
liability might kill nuclear power, but I think it more likely that reactors
built will be built effectively and cleanly instead.
Great bumper sticker I saw 25 years ago:
Chappaquiddick: 1
Three Mile Island: 0
- --
Treason! http://blog.mises.org/archives/007926.asp
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBSACu+y9Y35yItIgBAQLcKwf8DrxrbM7VovFeSxjJpnLXWuZM3zILSgRF
4XSuOQEGzU5nr93IszJ8GU+KtPUZBB3ibmU2K+93UuWVvcdFnyEpYwe9sT7vp4rQ
aq0I31ysIX8Ne23I8vwc0k9v/vkIMosEtnj0TyguJtKsU3HeDT1+t0zi3grmU6kA
jLQx7MVxApmC4+57JT3bwJLmw9T4fu7oc6e4KvElDQDlgzSG1CrMPuJcwr/d/65h
s9HfQS4pEbAfnjowhdAQQn3irYOGqP4AeFja+eNm9zD7IsiOnrwU/8Hf/Y3fmlMW
UMfvbEWkUJAOYo86AGZJHuPYd9x9HxuQClRwhU9/nvnY2/qmatGosA==
=1PDS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: