[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ip route weight stupid question



On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:59:10PM +0300, Stuart Gall wrote:
> Hello,
> SO I have scoured the internet, the man pages, groups. I just cant find 
> a definitive answer.
> 
> 
> weight NUMBER - is a weight for this element of a multi-
>      path route reflecting its relative bandwidth or quality.
> 
> 
> So more weight = better quality = preferred  ????
> 
> 
> e.g.
> ip route add default scope global nexthop via x.x.x.1 dev eth0 weight 1 
> nexthop via x.x.x.2 dev eth0 weight 2 
my understanding is that 2/3 will go via .2 and 1/3 will go via .1

try some thing like 

for x in ($seq 1 20)
do
	ip r g 1.1.2.$x
done

it should show you the route path taken and 33% should be via .1 and 66%
via .2

> 
> Does a higher weight mean that the route will be used more or used less ?
> 
> 
> TIA
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 

-- 
    The art of war is of vital importance
    to the State. It is a matter of life and death, a road 
    either to safety or to ruin. Hence it is a subject of 
    inquiry which can on no account be neglected.
    -- Sun Tzu - The Art of War

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: