Re: IBM DB2 V9.5 32 bits failed to allocate share memory
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: IBM DB2 V9.5 32 bits failed to allocate share memory
- From: Chris Bannister <mockingbird@earthlight.co.nz>
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 21:42:00 +1300
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20080402084200.GC4826@localhost.localdomain>
- In-reply-to: <47F101A5.8060900@gmail.com>
- References: <47E37D04.2030306@uti-group.com> <20080323113028.GA5352@box> <20080323144643.GC6512@titan.hooton> <5251dbe30803250151p64a55a73icd0fdb0ee7e7a76c@mail.gmail.com> <20080325232252.GB11288@box> <47EA0D5B.7050501@gmail.com> <20080329141336.GC16794@box> <47F101A5.8060900@gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:22:13PM +0200, cypherstrong wrote:
> Ok in fact what I have saw is this
>
> First, db2 start with 256m share memory ...
> So it's ok, they are be able to do it on both system
>
> Second, they try to change by following the memory of the system
> On redhat, it's ok
> On debian, they don't do it properly
> Perhaps it set a too high value
Sounds like Redhat + the db2 guys are hand in glove.
Does a search on google with, e.g, db2 Debian, as the search terms bring
up any thing interesting, or even db2 linux
Or probably even better: db2 linux shmmax :-)
> I have try the express version, so no support for that I think
> I could try to ask
>
> I'm waiting for a new version of db2
> I will see if the problem persist
>
> Thanks for support
No problem, hopefully you at least can sleep a little better. :-)
--
Chris.
======
Reply to: