Re: Why Red Hat is the "business" distro
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 22:39, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org> [2008 Mar 18 15:09 -0500]:
> > On Mon, March 17, 2008 10:10 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On 03/17/08 20:43, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > >> Perhaps it is something uniquely American, but the key to
> > >> understanding Ron's association is the wine tasting example given in
> > >> the article. As mentioned earlier in the thread, the sex scandal
> > >> mentioned only guaranteed more people would read the article.
> > >>
> > >> Hmmmm, kind of proves the point!
> >
> > Not really, Nate, look how many people didn't read the article
> > because of the sex scandal lead. :P
>
> And I gather that the two that posted about not reading it that I
> replied to are not in the USA where such a salacious lead-in works all
> too well quite often.
>
No, I read it, I was only saying I got to the same page as Tong, meaning: read
it again..
Thierry
Reply to: