Repository mirror ftp.us.debian.org 204.152.191.39 gone bad?
Hello,
Because I live in the US I prefer to use ftp.us.debian.org as my mirror of
choice in my apt source, however every once in a while I have problems with
it, which makes me think I should give up and use a different mirror. I think
the correct solution though is to fix the bad mirror, since its a choice I
expect many users/newbies use when they first install Debian in the US.
Today I went to install software on a matched pair of servers, and apt-get
update worked fine on the first one. "host ftp.us.debian.org" on the first
one shows the following:
:~# apt-get update
<snip>
Hit http://security.debian.org etch/updates/contrib Sources
Fetched 2B in 0s (5B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
:~# host ftp.us.debian.org
ftp.us.debian.org has address 128.30.2.36
ftp.us.debian.org has address 204.152.191.39
ftp.us.debian.org has address 35.9.37.225
ftp.us.debian.org has address 64.50.236.52
A half second later I did the same thing on the other server and I get:
:~# apt-get update
<snip>
Hit http://ftp.us.debian.org etch/main Sources
Get:3 http://ftp.us.debian.org etch/main Packages [5621kB]
99% [3 Packages gzip 0]
gzip: stdin: not in gzip format
Err http://ftp.us.debian.org etch/main Packages
Sub-process gzip returned an error code (1)
Fetched 3B in 0s (4B/s)
Failed to fetch
http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
Sub-process gzip returned an error code (1)
Reading package lists... Done
E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones
used instead.
:~# host ftp.us.debian.org
ftp.us.debian.org has address 204.152.191.39
ftp.us.debian.org has address 35.9.37.225
ftp.us.debian.org has address 64.50.236.52
ftp.us.debian.org has address 128.30.2.36
I tried it several times and i got the same error. This leads me to the
conclusion that something's wrong with 204.152.191.39. I've had this same
thing happen before but I don't know if it was on 204.152.191.39 or not.
I switched the second server to ftp.d.o and it works fine.
Can someone look into this?
Thanks,
JW
--
----------------------
System Administrator - Cedar Creek Software http://www.cedarcreeksoftware.com
http://jwadmin.blogspot.com/
Reply to: