Re: [OT] top posting

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [OT] top posting
From: David <davidpalmer@westnet.com.au>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:07:59 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 478C238F.9020108@westnet.com.au>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.58.0801151143290.13200@goldmund.pri>
References: <[🔎] 64a41c010801140821na0a5efdl489f7e64b11a436e@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.58.0801151143290.13200@goldmund.pri>

Peter F Bradshaw wrote:

Ok. Fine. Until you guys grow up this list is going to /dev/null.

On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Ebanutiy Ebanatik Ebanatovich wrote:

Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top
posting is in something technical (e.g. to help forum software to
create weekly digests correctly) or is it a question of etiquette?
Thanks


Cheers


What does he mean?
Cheers?
Regards,

--
David Palmer
Linux User - #352034

Reply to:

References:
- [OT] top posting
  - From: "Ebanutiy Ebanatik Ebanatovich" <ebanutiy.ebanatik.ebanatovich@gmail.com>
- Re: [OT] top posting
  - From: Peter F Bradshaw <pfb@exadios.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [OT] top posting
Next by Date: Re: [OT] top posting
Previous by thread: Re: [OT] top posting
Next by thread: Re: [OT] top posting
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread