[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Query about Iceape, Iceweasel



On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 08:13:54AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:51:21PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > Miles Bader wrote:
> > > I expect that google is somewhat chary about adding more buttons to
> > > their UI (look how long it took them to add a "delete" button!),
> > > especially one as potentially confusing as reply-to-list-only.  The
> > > current reply-to-all is much safer.
> > 
> >     Which is the exact reason why reply-to-list has been an open bug for =
> > TB!
> > for going on 4-5 years now.  They don't want to add another button and ca=
> > n't
> > agree on what the default behavior should be or if they should have a dro=
> > pdown
> >  menu like 1/2 the other buttons.  *sigh*
> 
> I started a small mailing list for some old buddies and I to use as we
> plan our camping trip for next year. Its something we do every 4 years
> or so and it generates all kinds of mail in the process. I thought a
> list would be a great way to manage that stuff. 

Yep, same for me

> So they are all pointy-clicky users who don't know much about
> computing and that's fine. The result is they don't have a clue,
> despite repeated explanation by me, how to use the list. A major part
> of that I put down to the fact that none of the popular mailers in use
> by user's of that other OS are equpped to handle mailing lists. 

And because of that I opted for the "groups" feature of one big free 
mail provider. It comes will all the "bells and whistles", like subject 
tagging and reply-to munging. Yuck!

> The folks at t-bird and google etc are all worried about how to
> present it blah blah blah. THey're afraid of confusing the users,
> whatever. Just stick it in there and let them figure it out. Its not
> *that* complicated and if the users are presented with it, they'll
> make it work. I swear dumbing down interfaces has done more to make
> dumb users than anything else.

There was a sig here somewhere (on d-d) ... here it is:
"Create a system that is usable even by idiots, and only idiots will use 
it."

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: