[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

URGENT: Intel Corporation Q963/Q965 : xorg problem



Hello,

I have a serious problem with Q963/Q965 graphic intel
card. I use the driver i810 and everything seems ok
except when I try to switch from X to console and to
back to X.
Then the display seems to be desynchronised.

I have tried a X restart but without success ... 
The only thing wich succeeds is to reboot 

Here are the logs that could help :

(WW) I810(0): Successfully set original devices (WW)
I810(0): Setting the original video mode instead of
restoring
        the saved state
(WW) I810(0): Extended BIOS function 0x5f05 not
supported.
(II) I810(0): BIOS call 0x5f05 not supported, setting
refresh with VBE 3 method.(II) I810(0):
xf86UnbindGARTMemory: unbind key 8 (II) I810(0):
xf86UnbindGARTMemory: unbind key 0
(II) I810(0): xf86UnbindGARTMemory: unbind key 1
(II) I810(0): xf86UnbindGARTMemory: unbind key 3
(II) I810(0): xf86UnbindGARTMemory: unbind key 2
(II) I810(0): xf86UnbindGARTMemory: unbind key 4
(II) I810(0): xf86UnbindGARTMemory: unbind key 5
(II) I810(0): xf86UnbindGARTMemory: unbind key 6
(II) I810(0): xf86UnbindGARTMemory: unbind key 7
(WW) I810(0): Successfully set original devices (2)
(II) I810(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for
kernel
(II) I810(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA
0xf8a9c000 at 0xb7b0f000


At the beginning, I have suspected a problem with the
keyboard cause I have a message describing a problem
with setkeycode .
So I tried getkeycodes which returned :

Plain scancodes xx (hex) versus keycodes (dec)
0 is an error; for 1-88 (0x01-0x58) scancode equals
keycode

KDGETKEYCODE: Aucun périphérique de ce type
failed to get keycode for scancode 0x5a
 0x58:   88  89

But, when I replace i810 by vga driver the problem
disappears ... 

can someone help me ...



Stephane Durieux 




      _____________________________________________________________________________ 
Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail 



Reply to: