On 06/02/07 10:44, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 07:06:40AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:On 06/01/07 22:45, Carl Fink wrote:I got the impression that NetBSD was behind on the technology curve, being less capable in SMP systems and not having a journaling FS.On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 10:57:54PM -0000, BartlebyScrivener wrote:What about FreeBSD? I may stick that on an old machine just to try it. I don't follow the politics, but maybe they would be your cup of tea?My ISP, Panix, uses NetBSD on their hosts. So far as I know, zero crasheshttp://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2006/08/30/0016.htmlNeither of which make it any less capable as a router or firewall system.
Journaling, not so much, but the routing and firewalling chores of a large ISP can put a serious load on a machine.
Horizontal scaling to the rescue, I guess. -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!