Re: Security question: are these vulnerabilities addressed?
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Security question: are these vulnerabilities addressed?
- From: Scott Gifford <sgifford@suspectclass.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:07:23 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] lyejkwz5ac.fsf@gfn.org>
- In-reply-to: <20070531041044.GB12900@localhost.localdomain> (Andrew Sackville-West's message of "Wed, 30 May 2007 21:10:45 -0700")
- References: <ly1wgzie5f.fsf@gfn.org> <f3i2hc$spe$1@sea.gmane.org> <lysl9flz1p.fsf@gfn.org> <20070531041044.GB12900@localhost.localdomain>
Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com> writes:
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 12:23:46AM -0400, Scott Gifford wrote:
>> Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <kamaraju@bluebottle.com> writes:
[...]
>> > BTW, is upgrade to Etch from Sarge not an option in your case?
>>
>> Our upgrade from Woody to Sarge was so disastrous, I will need more
>> time for this client to forget about it before I can propose another
>> upgrade. :-)
>>
>
> what were the woody -> sarge issues? perhaps they've been addressed...
Postgres completely fell apart, and it took many hours to piece things
back together.
-----Scott.
Reply to: