[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: apache2: no listening sockets



On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 12:06 +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote: 
> michael:
> > 
> > michael@manchester-campaigns:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 restart
> > Forcing reload of web server (apache2)...apache2: Could not reliably
> > determine the server's fully qualified domain name, using 127.0.0.1 for
> > ServerName
> 
> You may want to set ServerName in your apache configuration to get rid
> of this warning.
> 
> > httpd (no pid file) not running
> > apache2: Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified
> > domain name, using 127.0.0.1 for ServerName
> > (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address
> > 127.0.0.1:80
> 
> This means that some program is already listening on localhost:80. It
> may be a stale apache process which you could just kill or it is another
> webserver you have installed previously. In any case, you can set up
> apache to listen on a port other than 80 to mitigate this problem.
> 
> J.

Jochen, thanks for that. Using port 81 and it works (still need to sort
out ServerName but not sure what the 'httpd not running relates to?)

Also I think I shouldn't have anything else (already) running on port
80... but 'nmap' gives
michael@manchester-campaigns:~$ nmap -sV localhost

Starting Nmap 4.20 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2007-04-25 22:25 BST
Stats: 0:01:04 elapsed; 0 hosts completed (1 up), 1 undergoing Service
Scan
Service scan Timing: About 95.00% done; ETC: 22:26 (0:00:03 remaining)
Interesting ports on manchester-campaigns (127.0.0.1):
Not shown: 1677 closed ports
PORT    STATE SERVICE     VERSION
9/tcp   open  discard?
13/tcp  open  daytime
21/tcp  open  ftp         OpenBSD ftpd 6.4 (Linux port 6.4)
22/tcp  open  ssh         OpenSSH 4.2p1 Debian 5 (protocol 2.0)
25/tcp  open  smtp        Exim smtpd 3.36
37/tcp  open  time         (32 bits)
79/tcp  open  finger      Debian fingerd
80/tcp  open  tcpwrapped
81/tcp  open  http        Apache httpd 2.2.3 ((Debian))

but I am unsure what 'tcpwrapped' is...

Thanks, Michael



Reply to: