[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Relabel partition didn't work



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 20:49 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>> This discussion wouldn't be complete without a note about the FHS.
>> (see man hier and the debian policy manual).
>>
>> The FHS is a policy document about what directories can be where and
>> what they're used for.  
>>
>> Almost the whole directory tree is under the auspisis of the FHS.  If
>> you put a random directory within that tree, at some point there could
>> be conflict.
>>
>> There are four places within the directory tree you could place your
>> /store and be out of the way of the debian system:
>>
>> 	/home/store
>> 		assuming you never create a user named 'store'
>>
>> 	/usr/local/share/store
>> 		since ISOs are basically static, its similar to
>> 		putting a document under /usr/local/share/doc
>>
>> 	/var/local/store
>> 		If you are frequently adding and removing files from
>> 		store, it should go under /var (variable) since the
>> 		  idea of /usr is that it _can_ be mounted read-only.
>>
>> If its files to be placed by users (a communal bookshelf), I would put
>> it under /home
>>
>> If its files to be placed by admin/root/whatever, to be read by users,
>> I would put it under /var/local
>>
>> In any event, I would _not_ put it as /store.
> 
> Me? I put things on my stuff in:
> 
>         /exports/$sharename0
>         	 $sharename1
>         	 $sharename2
>         	 $sharename3
>         	 $sharename4
> 
> Where the nfs, samba, shfs, afs, etc... share them all with a same name
> 
> I guess I am non-FHS compliant that way. Though, I am consistent that
> way. It grew out of early problems complying with FHS years ago... its a
> bad habit, but a livable bad habit

What about /mnt or /media then?  I thought they were good places to
mount other partitions.  Doesn't that still fall under FHS compliance?

- --
Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGFfg8iXBCVWpc5J4RAmrxAKDEK+tVtEsy96igSZcMiPW6RJyEpACbBvOn
qVf346ciEN/fCJa7ysMwA+A=
=YizA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: