Re: GPL v3?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 05:02 -0500, Robert D. Crawford wrote:
>> Joe Hart <j.hart@orange.nl> writes:
>>
>>> Greg Folkert wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 23:43 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>>>> Just for the fun of it, I'd be interested in a little poll:
>>>>> 1 - are you generally in favor or against the GPLv3?
>>>> Yes.
>>> That answer says nothing. Analogy: Do you prefer chocolate or vanilla
>>> ice cream? Yes.
>> Actually, the answer _does_ mean something. In programming terms, if a
>> is true or b is true then the whole statement returns true.
>>
>> It is a joke.
>
> Cool. someone got it. They were an *OR* statement. There should actually
> be 4 questions there.
I get it, but you still didn't answer the poll. So let's put it this way:
Are you in favor of the GPLv3 (y/n)?
Do you prefer for things to stay with GPLv2 (y/n)?
Do you think that all of this is nonsense and irrelevant (y/n)?
Are we board because there are so few questions being asked (y/n)?
Now there are four questions. :;
Joe
- --
Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGE7hqiXBCVWpc5J4RAqdxAJ4udNes/m6KcqUgTWvh4jxvoeR+hACgn9fL
Vj0LCFE09cNXnOjQVzTkOFs=
=jpdL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: