Re: Help needed in removing warning: "Untrusted packages could ..."
Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 01:03:20AM +0100, s. keeling wrote:
> > Gabriel Parrondo <g.parrondo@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > El jue, 27-12-2007 a las 07:20 -0800, Raquel escribi=3DC3=3DB3:
> > > > On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:15:54 +0530
> > > > "Amogh Hooshdar" <amoghhooshdar@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there anything I can do to suppress this warning like making the
> > > > > system believe that I trust ftp.us.debian.org or whatever mirror I
> > > > > am using.
> > > >
> > > > Install debian-archive-keyring
> > >
> > > I always wonder how does that happen (which is very often). How can
> > > anybody miss that package if apt depends on it??
> >
> > (0) heretic /home/keeling_ aptitude show debian-archive-keyring
> > Package: debian-archive-keyring
> > State: installed
> > Automatically installed: no # <--
> > Version: 2007.07.31~etch1
> > Priority: important # <-- but not that important?
> > Section: misc
> > Maintainer: Michael Vogt <mvo@debian.org>
> > Uncompressed Size: 57.3k
> > Depends: gnupg (>=3D 1.0.6-4) # <-- hmm ...
> >
> > (0) heretic /home/keeling_ aptitude show gnupg
> > Package: gnupg
> > State: installed
> > Automatically installed: no # <--
> > Version: 1.4.6-2
> > Priority: important # <-- again.
>
> I think Gabriel meant this:
>
> $ apt-cache rdepends debian-archive-keyring
> debian-archive-keyring
> Reverse Depends:
> education-common
> cdebootstrap-static
> cdebootstrap
> apt
> ^^^^^^^
I agree, it's very confusing. apt was not auto-installed here, and
once it was dragged in, I still had to get debian-archive-keyring
myself.
(0) heretic /home/keeling_ aptitude show apt
Package: apt
State: installed
Automatically installed: no
Version: 0.6.46.4-0.1
Priority: important
Section: admin
Maintainer: APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>
Uncompressed Size: 4415k
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.6-6), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1-12), libstdc++6 (>= 4.1.1-12),
debian-archive-keyring
Is this "new" etch dependency handling? How's it work now?
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292
- - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me.
Reply to: