Re: Iceweasel version question

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Iceweasel version question
From: Florian Kulzer <florian.kulzer+debian@icfo.es>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:04:42 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20071228170442.GA11565@localhost>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 78582fa40712280624h58d8ed62i254492af808335ee@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 78582fa40712280624h58d8ed62i254492af808335ee@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 09:24:47 -0500, S Scharf wrote:
> Just curious, anyone know why/how debian stable is at version 2.0.0.10 for
> iceweasel but
> testing is still at 2.0.0.8?

AFAIK, the newer version was brought to Etch for security reasons:

http://www.debian.org/security/2007/dsa-1424

Lenny seems to be stuck at the older (probably vulnerable) version
because other release-critical bugs were found in the fixed version(s)
in Sid.

-- 
Regards,            | http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer
          Florian   |

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Iceweasel version question
  - From: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>

References:
- Iceweasel version question
  - From: "S Scharf" <ss11223@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: pgmemcache
Next by Date: Re: Using wdm how to pass "-- -logverbose 6" to startx?
Previous by thread: Re: Iceweasel version question
Next by thread: Re: Iceweasel version question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread