[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

dhcdbd and network errors



my network doesn't come up right now when I reboot.
I looked in message and found this, not sure what it means or if it is an 
issue (I'm using the nv device driver , not nvidia ):
Dec 14 16:01:25 paulandcilla dhcdbd: message_handler: message handler not 
found under /com/redhat/dhcp/eth0 for sub-path eth0.dbus.get.host_name
Dec 14 16:01:25 paulandcilla dhcdbd: message_handler: message handler not 
found under /com/redhat/dhcp/eth0 for sub-path eth0.dbus.get.domain_name
Dec 14 16:01:25 paulandcilla dhcdbd: message_handler: message handler not 
found under /com/redhat/dhcp/eth0 for sub-path eth0.dbus.get.nis_domain
Dec 14 16:01:25 paulandcilla dhcdbd: message_handler: message handler not 
found under /com/redhat/dhcp/eth0 for sub-path eth0.dbus.get.nis_servers

 *** WARNING *** Please fix your applic
ation to use the native API of Avahi!
Dec 14 11:57:12 paulandcilla cupsd[3597]: *** WARNING *** For more information 
s
ee <http://0pointer.de/avahi-compat?s=libdns_sd&e=cupsd>
Dec 14 11:57:14 paulandcilla kernel: device eth0 entered promiscuous mode
Dec 14 11:57:14 paulandcilla kernel: audit(1197651433.590:2): dev=eth0 
prom=256 
old_prom=0 auid=4294967295
Dec 14 11:57:14 paulandcilla kernel: device eth0 left promiscuous mode
Dec 14 11:57:14 paulandcilla kernel: audit(1197651434.090:3): dev=eth0 prom=0 
ol
d_prom=256 auid=4294967295
Dec 14 11:57:15 paulandcilla dhcdbd: Started up.
Dec 14 11:57:18 paulandcilla dhcdbd: message_handler: message handler not 
found 
under /com/redhat/dhcp/eth0 for sub-path eth0.dbus.get.reason
Dec 14 11:57:21 paulandcilla kernel: nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints 
kern
el.
Dec 14 11:57:21 paulandcilla kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:01:00.0[A] -> 
GSI 
16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
Dec 14 11:57:21 paulandcilla kernel: NVRM: loading NVIDIA UNIX x86 Kernel 
Module
  100.14.19  Wed Sep 12 14:12:24 PDT 2007


-- 
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux user # 367800
Registered Ubuntu User #12459



Reply to: